|
Post by evil2 on Feb 23, 2009 9:41:12 GMT -8
The only problem with that plan is then everyone will know you have the staff of command. And second that Blam could have killed Boozy if he tried to staby him which would not look good. Don't do this, let's think on it a little. I'm also not so sure that Boozy is lying anymore based on what pleo said about his inconsistancies in pms. Maybe he did tell that to Boozy.
|
|
|
Post by evil2 on Feb 23, 2009 9:45:08 GMT -8
Pleo was your comment about action pms meant to indicate that you didn't necessarly tell Boozy that he performed a non-action last night. Or am I reading too much into it.
|
|
|
Post by evil4 on Feb 23, 2009 9:49:33 GMT -8
Boozy did try to attack zuma, but since zuma was dead already, his action had no effect and we could not redirect it.
Just say that you don't intend to reveal right now. Others are doing the same. I think I'm the only one of us who might be in some hot water, but we just need to see where the tide is going to flow.
|
|
|
Post by Pleonast on Feb 23, 2009 10:11:45 GMT -8
If a character's target is dead before actions are resolved (i.e., Cursed-killed or Disintegrated), any action targeting them becomes a "no action".
|
|
|
Post by evil1 on Feb 23, 2009 11:19:49 GMT -8
The only problem with that plan is then everyone will know you have the staff of command. And second that Blam could have killed Boozy if he tried to staby him which would not look good. Don't do this, let's think on it a little. I'm also not so sure that Boozy is lying anymore based on what pleo said about his inconsistancies in pms. Maybe he did tell that to Boozy. The first part I wasn't too worried about, but the second is a good point. I'll just keep mum about my action.
|
|
|
Post by evil3 on Feb 23, 2009 13:38:11 GMT -8
I'll vote storyteller. He appears to be on to a few of us. However, he is also a possible redirect target.
|
|
|
Post by evil2 on Feb 23, 2009 14:47:43 GMT -8
If a character's target is dead before actions are resolved (i.e., Cursed-killed or Disintegrated), any action targeting them becomes a "no action". This indicates to me that Boozy was indeed lying. I think this is something to bring up at a time when someone ends up night-killed and not cursed. I think he is a CG who is saving his kill for later to steal the win.
|
|
|
Post by evil4 on Feb 23, 2009 15:22:37 GMT -8
I don't think so. It seems to me that he PM'd Pleo his action then never changed it.
|
|
|
Post by evil4 on Feb 23, 2009 15:24:36 GMT -8
Did anybody see my nifty player notes thread?
|
|
|
Post by evil2 on Feb 23, 2009 15:27:23 GMT -8
Yes but Pleo is saying that his response to Boozy's action was "no action" taken. Boozy could not have tried to kill zuma because zuma didn't exist anymore. So there could be no I got the response that I made the stabby move into thin air. That's the way I'm reading it, I could possibly (probably) be wrong.
|
|
|
Post by evil4 on Feb 23, 2009 16:04:22 GMT -8
Mhaye says that he would have reported someone taking an action against sachertorte if he had seen it, so I guess my wand of holding failed otherwise he would have seen me do something magical to sach. He does know who sach investigated though but he's not telling.
|
|
|
Post by evil2 on Feb 23, 2009 16:49:25 GMT -8
I didn't realize the wand of holding had a failure clause. It's more likely his dice roll didn't see you do anything. Or he's being an evil bastard waiting for you to say what you did and then pounce on you for lying. Hmmmm. I really am getting paranoid since I started playing this game.
|
|
|
Post by evil4 on Feb 23, 2009 16:55:25 GMT -8
I don't see that it does have a failure clause, but he said that he did see who Sach targeted. I'm confused. At the very least I'm not saying anything about my action.
|
|
|
Post by evil2 on Feb 23, 2009 17:12:13 GMT -8
thanks for the list evil4, hehe I like posting that
|
|
|
Post by evil2 on Feb 23, 2009 19:10:39 GMT -8
I'm not sure we can redirect storyteller. His action takes place before disintegration so before our actions take place. I can go for storyteller or shadowfacts. I'll post a vote tomorrow am but will be traveling all a bunch of the day tomorrow so will not be back at end of day.
|
|
|
Post by evil3 on Feb 24, 2009 0:17:10 GMT -8
If I'm going down, I'll try to tie the vote so someone goes with me.
|
|
|
Post by evil1 on Feb 24, 2009 9:42:20 GMT -8
Plans for our actions?
|
|
|
Post by Pleonast on Feb 24, 2009 10:50:24 GMT -8
The only Curse vote is on storyteller?
|
|
|
Post by evil1 on Feb 24, 2009 11:47:43 GMT -8
Vote boozahol[/color]
Dubious about this, but I think leaving a spare kill lurking about isn't too smart.
|
|
|
Post by evil4 on Feb 24, 2009 11:52:54 GMT -8
vote boozy for curse
|
|
|
Post by evil4 on Feb 24, 2009 11:54:52 GMT -8
I PM'd pleo that I will be trying to take something from the Hoard. Don't know what I'll get if anything, but I can always say I watched the Hoard if I'm watched. It's physical.
|
|
|
Post by evil1 on Feb 24, 2009 11:55:58 GMT -8
I'm also going to steal randomly from the horde, hoping for the orb.
|
|
|
Post by Pleonast on Feb 24, 2009 11:57:28 GMT -8
Note that your votes are split. I will randomly choose among the players voting to see who gets Cursed.
|
|
|
Post by evil4 on Feb 24, 2009 12:01:17 GMT -8
I don't think it matters, just tell us which it was please.
|
|
|
Post by evil1 on Feb 24, 2009 12:01:28 GMT -8
Yeah. The chances aren't weighted, are they?
|
|