|
|
Post by Pleonast on Jan 24, 2014 13:17:11 GMT -8
Hello again!
|
|
|
|
Post by argyle on Jan 24, 2014 13:33:36 GMT -8
Did we get an investigation in last Night?
|
|
|
|
Post by witchywoman on Jan 24, 2014 13:54:11 GMT -8
"Gnarlycharlie is a pagan."
And if I read my role PM correctly, took no action last night, either.
|
|
|
|
Post by argyle on Jan 24, 2014 14:15:38 GMT -8
SisC, a question for you.
You Investigated Mahaloth on Night 1. If I'm not mistaken, your power is "Each Night you may learn the alignment of another living player, but will fail if they are attempting to use any active powers."
Your power failed. I was thinking that was because of the redirection of Investigative powers to gnarly. But he didn't say anything about getting a result with Mahaloth's alignment. Which would mean that Mahaloth must used an active power on Night 1, wouldn't it? Which he has claimed not to have done.
Or else it means that gnarly withheld information...but since he posted a number of <redacted> comments, I don't see why he'd leave this one out altogether.
|
|
|
|
Post by croney on Jan 24, 2014 14:37:09 GMT -8
I'll be online pretty much all day unless I get called into work on my day off for a third time.
Please feel free to convince me I am barking up the wrong tree about things n stuff.
|
|
|
|
Post by argyle on Jan 24, 2014 14:48:11 GMT -8
You may very well have the right tree. I can't fault your logic. But we know that this game is not necessarily logical, and "Scum wouldn't do that" is usually an accurate indicator. And I just don't think Idle, as Scum, would be quite so bold as to claim 'Unblockable, Un-redirectable Investigator', unforced, on Day 1.
I'm not ruling it out completely, but I'm not ready to lynch someone in order to prove/disprove it yet, either.
|
|
|
|
Post by croney on Jan 24, 2014 14:54:02 GMT -8
You may very well have the right tree. I can't fault your logic. But we know that this game is not necessarily logical, and "Scum wouldn't do that" is usually an accurate indicator. And I just don't think Idle, as Scum, would be quite so bold as to claim 'Unblockable, Un-redirectable Investigator', unforced, on Day 1. I'm not ruling it out completely, but I'm not ready to lynch someone in order to prove/disprove it yet, either. I still believe Idle is town. The raven being used against both of us would indicate he's been cursed or tampered with or mad-bombed. That's why my vote's on Swammi, not Idle. |
|
|
|
Post by croney on Jan 24, 2014 14:55:43 GMT -8
Also, technically, Idle seems to claim every game, regardless of circumstances, much to the irritation of others.
I don't think it's wise but it's something you just deal with. It doesn't always lose games so therefore it is a valid style choice.
So I eliminated idle claiming early regardless of role as being a likelihood of scum/innocence determination factor.
|
|
|
|
Post by witchywoman on Jan 24, 2014 16:10:25 GMT -8
Yeah, Idle's claiming is a null tell. And, oddly, if memory serves he HAS claimed as Scum on Day One, too. ANd didn't get lynched.
But that's trusting my memory, which is like a steel trap: Rusty and illegal in 14 states.
argyle, I need to look at Gnarly's post again. Didn't he have results on Maha? That were "redacted"?
|
|
|
|
Post by witchywoman on Jan 24, 2014 16:20:08 GMT -8
Okay, so.
"Mahaloth visited no one. Mahaloth was visited by [long list of people.]"
So, no. It does not appear I would have gotten a result if Gnarly hadn't stolen my results. Which does imply that Maha used a Night Power.
From my PM
However, that doesn't necessarily mean he lied about his conversion power being a Day power. He may have chosen to activate the power associated with his Sin. And I'd rather not go any further down that road just at the moment.
|
|
|
|
Post by witchywoman on Jan 24, 2014 16:22:46 GMT -8
NETA because it comes too close to discussing what his possible Cardinal Sin might be, and that's a big fat no-no as far as I'm concerned.
|
|
|
|
Post by witchywoman on Jan 27, 2014 9:43:57 GMT -8
The Cardinal Sin power should not affect my investigation.
|
|
|
|
Post by argyle on Jan 27, 2014 12:09:17 GMT -8
To what specifically are you referring there? Are you talking about Mahaloth's Cardinal Sin power, meaning that if he used it, that would not have affected your investigation?
Meaning the fact that neither you nor gnarly got a result on him indicates that he did use an active power that Night, despite the fact that he said he didn't?
Or are you talking about something else?
|
|
|
|
Post by witchywoman on Jan 27, 2014 15:41:05 GMT -8
I am saying that I thought there was a possibility that the Cardinal Sin power might have affected my investigation. However, at this point I think it is safe to say that he did use an active Night power.
|
|
|
|
Post by witchywoman on Jan 28, 2014 11:29:10 GMT -8
Regarding Giraffe's post: I hinted that I had a what now?
|
|
|
|
Post by argyle on Jan 28, 2014 13:19:48 GMT -8
Although he mentioned you in the 'Night two' section of his post, I believe he may be referring to Post 110 from Day 3:
I'm guessing that Giraffe thinks that's a soft-Doctor claim.
|
|
|
|
Post by witchywoman on Jan 28, 2014 14:05:22 GMT -8
Except that gnarly specified he stole the "investigation" results!
|
|
